Elizabeth Ionescu vs Meghna Arun Kumar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Jul at 07:35 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Ionescu vs M. Arun Kumar

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ionescu 1 - 0 Kumar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Elizabeth Ionescu winning 2 and Meghna Arun Kumar winning 0. The last match between Elizabeth Ionescu and Meghna Arun Kumar was at the W100 Evansville, 21-07-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Elizabeth Ionescu getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ionescu | 1 |
| Kumar | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W100 Evansville(07-21-25)
E. Ionescu vs M. A. Kumar H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.06% (24-23) | Career Total W/L | 26.32% (10-28) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Ionescu vs M. A. Kumar Match Preview:
- Regarding second serve points, Kumar leads with 39.76% compared to Ionescu's 36.71%. Could this statistic play a crucial role? It often correlates with match outcomes.
- In breaking down return game capabilities, Ionescu excels by winning 51.8% of their adversary's second serve points, while Kumar secures 46.81%.
- When analyzing first-serve returns, Ionescu maintains an edge at 34.02%, compared with Kumar's 31.69%.
- Facing break points, Kumar's resilience is highlighted by saving 48.57% of threats. In contrast, Ionescu saves 39.08%.
- Recent performance shows Kumar with a 15.38% win rate, while Ionescu boasts a higher 45.45% win rate, offering insight into overall form.
- Surface preferences show Kumar prospers on Clay with a 33% success rate, yet Ionescu commands Indoor Hard courts at 73%.
- Player level comparison reveals Kumar's 25% success in Challenger/ITF events, while Ionescu slightly exceeds at 33.33%.
- Considering opponent quality, Kumar encounters slightly stronger foes, averaging a rank of 274 versus Ionescu's 326.82.
- In deciding sets, Ionescu secures 33% of victories, whereas Kumar has yet to clinch any in the past year.
- Breakpoint conversion shows Ionescu achieving 40.35% success, compared to Kumar's 33.33%. How might this influence key game moments?
Editorial Prediction (July 21, 2025, UTC):
As we explore the various statistics, Kumar demonstrates superiority in second-serve points, indicating a potential advantage in maintaining service games.
Nevertheless, Ionescu showcases formidable return game skills, significantly outperforming Kumar in both first and second serve return points.
Although Kumar is more efficient in saving breakpoints, Ionescu excels in capitalizing on breakpoint chances, which could tilt crucial points in their favor.
While Kumar faces more competitive opponents, Ionescu's higher recent win rate and better deciding set performance imply a stronger capacity for victory under pressure.
Based on surface performance, Ionescu's success indoors adds another layer of potential dominance, especially considering their overall better statistics.
Despite Kumar's prowess in isolated stats, the balance tilts towards Ionescu as the more likely winner in this upcoming match, due to their superior overall performance metrics and consistent capabilities in match play.
Elizabeth Ionescu vs Meghna Arun Kumar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Ionescu vs M. A. Kumar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:4:56 | Average Match Time | 1:4:56 |
| 64% (27/42) | 1st Serve % | 76% (28/37) |
| 78% (21/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (15/28) |
| 53% (8/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (3/9) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (19/37) | Return Points Win % | 31% (13/42) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Ionescu Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-0 5-7 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 7-6(1) 3-6 6-4 | ||
M. A. Kumar Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||

E. Ionescu vs M. A. Kumar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.06% (24/23) | YTD Win/Loss | 26.32% (10/28) |
| 52.43% (54/49) | Sets Win/Loss | 27.50% (22/58) |
| 51.90% (450/417) | Games Win/Loss | 39.15% (276/429) |
| 44.83% (13/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 25.71% (9/26) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 72.73% (8/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 27 | Aces Total | 9 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 116 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 1:17:7 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 305.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 169.42 |
| 59% (1340/2285) | 1st Serve % | 63% (404/642) |
| 59% (796/1340) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (214/404) |
| 44% (420/945) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (93/238) |
| 51% (138/271) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (17/41) |
| 46% (1030/2259) | Return Points Win % | 37% (224/604) |
| 47.22% (17/19) | Challenger W/L | 20.00% (3/12) |
| 63.64% (7/4) | Futures W/L | 30.43% (7/16) |
| 49% (22/45) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 26% (10/38) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 27% (3/11) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 85% (27/23) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (11/9) |
| 15% (27/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (11/2) |
| 5% (20/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (27/1) |